Popup interface and result states
A polished popup UI with loading, empty, error, saved audit, and result states to make extension usage feel complete rather than utilitarian.
Production-style Chrome extension that analyzes live webpages for SEO, accessibility, image, and page structure issues using content scripts and browser APIs.
This project demonstrates frontend engineering beyond standard web pages: popup UI states, content script execution, browser storage, export flows, and issue reporting designed for real audit workflows inside Chrome.
Browser API Scope
Content scripts, Chrome storage, export actions, and stateful popup flows inside Manifest V3
Frontend Breadth
Scoring, issue grouping, restricted-page handling, and polished state management in one tool
Public Proof
Chrome Web Store listing plus public GitHub repository for direct recruiter verification
Overview
The emphasis is on how the interface is structured, how the flows connect, and what the frontend decisions communicate about product readiness.
Frontend Audit Extension is positioned as a production-style browser extension that expands the portfolio beyond standard websites and mobile apps into browser tooling, audit workflows, and extension-specific frontend architecture.
The project is grounded in real proof links: a public Chrome Web Store listing and a public GitHub repository. The emphasis is on content scripts, browser APIs, audit scoring, and UI states rather than invented business claims.
Project Snapshot
Role
Frontend Engineer
Format
React + Vite Chrome Extension
Primary focus
Chrome Extension Frontend Tool
Project Media
Each image is served from the public directory so stronger screenshots or recordings can be swapped in later without touching the layout system.
What I Built
Popup interface and result states
A polished popup UI with loading, empty, error, saved audit, and result states to make extension usage feel complete rather than utilitarian.
Audit analysis workflow
Multi-category audit scoring across SEO, accessibility, images, and page structure with severity-based issue recommendations.
Browser API integration
Chrome Storage API and content script integration for local history, restricted-page handling, and page-level audit execution.
Export-friendly reporting
JSON and CSV export support for sharing audit findings beyond the extension itself.
Audit Workflow Highlights
The strongest signal here is the combination of browser integration, analysis logic, and user-facing result states inside a compact extension experience.
Highlight 1
Content scripts analyze the current page for SEO, accessibility, image, and structure issues directly inside the browser context.
Highlight 2
Issues are grouped and prioritized so the extension surfaces actionable problems instead of overwhelming the user with raw checks.
Highlight 3
The extension accounts for pages where audits cannot run normally, which improves credibility compared with a happy-path-only tool.
Highlight 4
Local history and JSON or CSV export flows make the tool useful beyond a single one-off scan.
Technical Highlights
A recruiter or hiring manager should be able to see the engineering depth quickly without reading a wall of text.
Manifest V3 frontend structure
The codebase uses a modern React and Vite setup inside Chrome Manifest V3 constraints, balancing developer experience with extension runtime requirements.
Content script and popup coordination
The extension coordinates page analysis and popup display states cleanly so audit results remain understandable and predictable.
State persistence with Chrome Storage API
Saved audit history and related flows rely on browser-native storage rather than one-session-only state.
Structured exports and UX states
Export support and deliberate handling of loading, empty, error, and saved states strengthen the product quality of the extension.
Frontend Decisions
These decisions show the product and architectural thinking behind the implementation.
Decision 1
The extension is framed as a usable frontend product, not just a technical demo, which is why popup states and issue presentation matter so much.
Decision 2
Severity and category framing help the user understand what to fix first instead of reading an unstructured audit dump.
Decision 3
The Chrome Web Store listing gives stronger credibility than a local-only extension demo and shows distribution-oriented frontend delivery.
Decision 4
Even without bespoke screenshots, the project uses the same case study structure as the other flagship projects to keep the portfolio cohesive.
Why It Matters
Value 1
It expands the portfolio beyond websites into browser extension frontend engineering.
Value 2
It shows practical use of browser APIs, content scripts, local persistence, and structured UX states.
Value 3
It adds public Chrome Web Store proof that complements the web and mobile projects.
Links